Why all the media discussion, allegation, revelations are centralised to few selected person, party , few state, or even relates to few particular offences ? Just observe the list of few major media news headlines in last three months, where we find the following news dominated 95% of time and coverage.
1.Muzffernagar riot and what BJP,Amit Shah did, 2. riot area visit by Rahul and what he alleged on BJP and ISI, 3. Patna rally of Modi and bomb blast and what Nitish Kumar alleged on BJP and Modi, 4.ISRO spy case and what the cop BBKumar has said on Modi's Gujarat, 5.Asharam and son Sai sexual offence and their hiding in Gujarat, 6.Coalgate and loss of files, 7.Gen VK Singh and his association with Modi in Rewari, 8.CPM Chief Karat's accusation on Modi for majority appeasement, 9.Kapil Sibbal's challenge to Modi for debate,10.Amit Shah Gujarat snoop scandal. 11. the latest black painting of AAP leaders by a past BJP man, 12. Anna discarding Kejriwal on the advice of BJP 13. Modi calling Rahul Sehjada. 14. Dig sir calling Modi communal.
It shows that our democracy has really extra matured enough to rotate around one or two important persons or to the happening in one or two states. Here we are missing a lot, as most of the south,the north east and even politically alert East are largely miss being discussed,as these people, their problems rarely discussed in the the main stream media and in the political discussion.
Is it not a fact the Indian people in large or even the prominent media men know or discuss more about a one state outfit AAP and know the names of more leaders of that party, then they can describe the names of local leaders of state of Kerala, Karnataka and Tamilnadu combined ? How many of us for sure know , where Mizoram is situated and who are the parties and the leaders fighting the election, there.
Are not we in this fashion gradually alienating a big part of our population, in the way we had done with the tribal in many central states of India ? Most of the centralised leaders and the people remain aloof with these distant placed people of India. As we know very little about them, we do care much little about them, thus pushing them away from the main stream politics and neglecting the needed attention on their welfare.
The basic objective of such critical analysis is important for the nation, that the mainstream political parties and their leaders have become selfish, and they need to change their habits. They are much greedy to keep powers permanantly to them and along with the resulted limelight, remaining focused on them. Winning election , keeping power has become a bigger objective of the leaders, then the thought and acts needed for the entire nation's welfare and development.We want to defeat any challenger at any cost .
Otherwise why we are putting 90% attention on Modi and Gujarat ? Is not this shows Modi is a justified candidate for PM post, as he alone has marginalised all the big stalwarts from most of the political parties, forcing them to revolve around him.
Yes if now the people select him, they are making no mistake, as hundreds of you political leaders have done all possible attempts to check, verify, investigate , analyse him, just as we do while purchasing an earthen pot. Modi, as and when, if wins, he will come out as one being the "ISI tested and certified 24 carrat gold" .