As Indian foreign minister, Salman Khurshid was projecting his tough talks with Sartaj Aziz on the ceasefire violations;while the same Sartaj Aziz, an adviser to Nawaz Sharif, was asked to meet Kashmiri separatists in Delhi.
Was it a justified decision ? The Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh, the biggest supporter of talks with Pakistan, in spite of all the adverse actions enacted by the ISI and army in Kashmir,has taken a correct step, in allowing the meeting knowing well, what Sartaj Aziz was expected to tell the Hurriyat leaders ?
Syed Ali Shah Geelani, a hard line Hurriyat spokesman, said to the media after the meeting, that Pakistan would continue to support the "separatist cause" in Jammu & Kashmir .
It was in response to what ,"Geelani demanded from Aziz, "that Pakistan should continue to support the Kashmir cause politically as well as diplomatically, besides through other means, and highlight human rights violations in J&K at the hands of the security forces," .
Geelani, most influential hard line Kashmiri separatist leader in the Valley,who met Aziz in New Delhi on Sunday last along with other separatists, also told Aziz that out-of-the-box solution to the Kashmir problem won't be acceptable to Kashmiris and Pakistan needs to pursue UN resolutions that emphasise on permanent solution of the problem.
Chairman of Hurriyat's moderate faction, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, told Aziz he wasn't averse to talks between India and Pakistan on Kashmir.Other Hurriyat sources said,"both Geelani and Dukhtaran-e-Millat chief Asiya Andrabi criticised Pakistan for its "u-turn" on its earlier stand on Kashmir".
It is utmost importance to note that Geelani met Aziz seperately, after the moderate separatists including Mirwaiz and Yasin Malik had left the venue, a source Akbar, who accompanied Geelani to the meeting, said,"We should get rid of the Indian rule in J&K and be allowed to decide our future under UN resolutions of 1947," .
INDIA HONEST wish to discuss and remind the Congress , who has ruled the nation, since the inception of this Kashmir crisis in 1948 to date for at least six decades, why they are not on one page with the Indians or all the Indian political parties ? Why they are still experimenting with their momentary solution ? Is not it a matter of national importance ?
What is your (all the Congress prime ministers since 1947) ideology, strategy or resolution on Kashmir, except that what, "your deed announcement from the top of hill that "Kashmir is an integral part of India" ?
Are you sure in the core of your heart, that what you are saying,you are also determined and strong enough and acting adequately to get that ? No you are lingering this, you are neglecting this intentionally, afraid of taking a tough but calculated action in the national interest and proud.
Look, though historically Tibet was not a part of China, but by the inherent patriotism and determination of Chinese rulers, who made it possible to acquire it , in spite of strong resistance from the Tibetan people and in spite of international huge opposition.
Show me one Congressman , who is determined to run to the last mile to get back the Pok from Pakistan and keep the head of India, Kashmir intact in the map. No, by habit Congress leaders have become casual,here the early loss of Sardar Patel,will be counted in Indian history as one of the biggest loss for India, even bigger then the cruel fact that Sardar, being not made first PM of India, ahead of Nehru .