Why Media now Blasting on Turncoat Kejriwal's Sanctimony ?

Media's bipartisan  glare had the biggest contribution in making of Arvind Kejriwal from an NGO activist to much talked political leader, but the recent revelations has forced the change of course by the same media to save their skin from getting bust in public eyes. 

Twitter blasting regular bomb shell on aapdrama Kejriwal : 

indiahonest.blogspot.in @indiahonest  twitter :

@FarjiKejri #PaidMedia #aapdrama, Many Legend national leaders joining @AamAadmiParty after 50 years of blank public life, justified their entry in #NaxalAAP #OldAgeHome @fast publicity and power.

nt as well television media has now critically focused on the bluff and regular tripping by the AAP leader Kejriwal, even  much enthusiastically as seen and felt now : "They were arguing that the AAP leader is conceited and may be tripping occasionally, but that's only because he has set the bar high . But the same media is now questioning if Kejriwal's sanctimony will sound his death knell ? 

INDIA HONEST reasons, why the fourth pillar missed the same points earlier as stated below : "India's media and Twittery are preoccupied with another exercise entirely - feverishly unearthing videos, interviews and pretty much any available material that could remotely be of use to call Arvind Kejriwal's bluff. Every exploit - past and present - of the Aam Aadmi Party chief is at this time being scanned under a microscopic lens, with a media contingent on the prowl, waiting for him to falter".

IH  finds the change in description now as : "Late last week, Kejriwal's seemingly innocuous decision to take a private charter jet from Jaipur to Delhi to attend the India Today Conclave became the focal point of an hour long TV debate. Kejriwal's adversaries accused him of being a fraud, while some of his own party members openly admonished the act saying it went against the very grain of the Aam Aadmi philosophy that Kejriwal peddles.

The rabid, unforgiving TV anchor on that debate countered Kejriwal's contention that the media house organising the event had paid for the charter, by pointing out that he shouldn't shouldn't be accepting such privileges from the very media he accuses of being 'paid'. Good point!

IH  feels that such revelations on the media has proved the occasional allegation on them of hand-in-gloves in political conspiracy, and that has hurt most on the trust of millions of people in the fourth pillar .