Now a days most political leaders, even the Congress senior spokesperson Dig sir forget in the heat of criticising Modi that it is not state election of Gujarat but Loksabha election of India for which Narendra Modi from Gujarat is only prime ministerial candidate of BJP party.It is just like in an India - Pakistan cricket match, some commentator said that Sir Ravindra Jadeja did not bowl well in last three overs, but India won the game.
Why these leaders, in the present age of "jet and net" and "mobile and Ipod", treat the public as fool. People can interpret data well, you can't misguide them either positively in your favour or negatively against your opponents by quoting one liner..........that the Planning Commission to say that outstanding liability in Gujarat was 25.20 percent of the Gross State Domestic Product, compared to 24.13 percent in all states. Does this bare data have any meaning conclusion ?
INDIA HONEST wants to know : Do Dig sir proposing that the next assembly or the parliament election will be a battle between India and Gujarat? What should be the criteria then for the arguments or comparisons ?
Why Gujarat's charts and figures of growth and development or employment generated or roads or other infrastructure developed or irrigation facilities provided or per capita production and income increased should not be compared with any other state/states and that preferably of any Congress ruled state? Again this should be done only with the purpose of judging only, if Narendra Modi is capable of doing better things as a chief minster? If yes then he may do better at national level also and shall be considered as that.
Dig sir and our respected F.M. Mr. Chidambaram, why are you jealous with the progress of a state within India even though it is managed by a BJP Chief Minister.One should be glad and should opt to replicate in other states and why not in India also.