Humiliation Forwarded from Digi sir to Renuka Choudhury in Telangana

Digvijaya Singh targeted Gujarat CM Narendra Modi and his BJP colleagues  saying they badly needed "lessons in good behaviour and social etiquette" and joked on Narendra Modi .

Is not this "lessons in good behaviour and social etiquette" are more needed by the unruly and undisciplined members of Congress party ? Will Dig sir preach the lesson and start first applying  the theory to his party, which has already discarded him ?

On day one, "Congress finally signalled closer of  its doors on AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh,  even denying him entry into the state PCC conference hall for the press conference called by Union minister of state Jyotiraditya Scindia and Mohan Prakash, Sanjay Nirupam, Kantilal Bhuria,Ajay Singh".

On day two another senior leader and Congress spokesperson MP Renuka Chowdhury was asked to leave from a Telangana Congress meeting,by a few leaders for her alleged anti-Telangana stand.

Angry Karimnagar MP Ponnam Prabhakar said, "Renuka Chowdhury's anti-Telangana stand is well-known. I don't know why she came for the meeting when no one invited her. When thousands had committed suicide for the cause of Telangana, she had said the deaths were due to cancer," . 

Renuka Choudhury was left red-faced when some members reminded her how she had once called Telangana activists "goonda elements" and demanded an apology.

Telangana Congress members said, "While no one wanted her presence, we demanded an apology from her before attending the meeting. She neither apologised nor left although we asked her to leave. It was a shameless act, and we ignored her," .

The announcement of Telangana was made by the Congress government in hurry without making proper ground work and without definite intentions; it was just to fool the agitated members of parliament and to manage the floor of the disrupted Monsoon session. Was not it  a false promise made ,without the intention of completing it to result during their tenure ?

Congress Working Committee adopted a resolution on Telangana, but the Home Ministry, that was piloting the cabinet resolution has failed to suggest a concrete solution to Hyderabad, with both Telangana and Seemandhara members not agreeing on any of the options on Hyderabad, resulting the Telangana resolution in limbo.

Will Digvijaya Singh Now Join Hands with his bete noire BJP ?

It is no coincidence that young performing political leaders are replacing the old guards on vital stage of state and central politics. Omar Abdulla, Rahul Gandhi, Sukhvir Singh Badal, Narendra Modi, Mamta Banerjee, Jyotiraditya Scindia, have stepped into the shoes of their old seniors like Manmohan Singh, Farook Abdulla, Prakash Singh Badal, Lal Krishna Adwani, Digvijaya Singh and many old guards.

21st century has a new wave of fresh air in the support of young Turk performers, blended with the experience and guidance of old warhorses. A forty year old economist Raghuram Rajan is better suited to head the central bank RBI then any near sixty, retiring secretary from finance department, but still Amritya Sen or Bhagvati or Rangarajan's advices are more valuable for guidance purpose .

The wise like Manmohan Singh, L K Adwani, Sonia Gandhi , Farook Abdulla relinquish their decorated post gladly, but few power hungry like Digvijaya Singh, Ajit Jogi  will never be able to read between the lines and thus are forcibly discarded.

An outspoken or rather foul spoken General Secretary of Congress has been ousted from his power post for a decade, but his desire for that has not been lost, for that he always prefers to be in the media lime light, more often for wrong reasons or even attempts to anti national mutterings such as :

A day after Congress disowned Shakeel Ahmed's statement in the tweet alleging that the banned terror outfit "Indian Mujahideen was formed after the Gujarat riots" that stirred a political storm; but media glare happy Digvijaya Singh said, "Ahmed was an "experienced" leader and "he must have made the comments after proper thought".

Digvijaya Singh had earlier doubted over the authenticity of Batala House encounter in which Delhi Police decorated officer M.C. Sharma was killed and even he termed the encounter as fake and demanded for judicial enquiry into it. Singh refused to take back his words even after the Delhi sessions court judgement in which court hold Indian Mujahideen operative Shahzad Ahmed guilty of killing inspector MC Sharma and termed 2008 Batala House encounter as genuine.The judgement has once again exposed the habit of Congress general secretary to give controversial and irresponsible statement. 

Digvijaya Singh targeted Gujarat CM Narendra Modi and his BJP colleagues  saying they badly needed "lessons in good behaviour and social etiquette" and joked on Narendra Modi for  making his speeches from the replicas of the Red Fort rather than the real one.

Showing his character Digvijaya Singh targeted columnist Shobha De for her remark that many political leaders are as 'sadak chaap', Singh noted (or accepted what he is destined to ? ) that the remark does at least appreciate the fact that politicians have "their foot firmly on ground".

Digvijaya Singh had been getting unfair treatment at the hands of party men and specially a much younger Jyotiraditya Scindia, who is being portrayed as the Congress' chief minister probable. Earlier this month, the Scindia faction organised a rally in Morena where Digvijaya Singh was kept waiting and sweating profusely on the dais,for more than two hours by the Union minister of state.

But on last evening, the Congress finally signalled closer of  its doors on AICC general secretary Digvijaya Singh,  even denying him entry into the state PCC conference hall for the press conference called by Union minister of state Jyotiraditya Scindia and Mohan Prakash, Sanjay Nirupam, Kantilal Bhuria,Ajay Singh.

Digvijaya Singh and his supporters stood outside, banging the doors for nearly 20 minutes, making desperate calls from their mobile phones asking Congress workers inside to open the door. The banging on the door continued, but Scindia refused to buzz and asked Congress workers not to let in whoever was knocking. Senior Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam also instructed not to allow him. Yes, Scindia  said to press there was no factional rivalry within the party, echoing the high command's view on Digvijaya Singh . 

Even highly desperate Dig sir tried to gain entry through the back door, that was also jammed and then the miffed Dig sir turned to the elevator but that was also shut on second floor. An infuriated and irate Dig sir and his supporters  walked out of the state Congress office. Feeling hurt and humiliated, he climbed into his SUV and left the Congress office with his supporters following in a cavalcade. 

Humiliated  time and again by the Congress party and their leaders, what the frustrated  Dig sir will do now ? 

Will Digi sir join hands now with his bete noire BJP ?

Is Modi's Slogan of Congress Mukt Bharat a Fascist Statement ?

Congress leader Digvijaya Singh today reached out to all non-BJP parties on the plank of secularism and asked, "Isn't Modi and now BJP's slogan of Congress Mukt Bharat fascist ? For would all other non-BJP, non-communal political parties please respond ?"

Yes Mr. Dig sir, most of the "so called" (as per your criteria and definition) "non-communal" were waiting for your order and instructions, and tomorrow morning first thing they will do to stand in queue at the nearest court and will make affidavit calling the Narendra Modi, this century's greatest fascist, even bigger then Hitler or Mussolini.

Dear learned politician Dig sir, will you explain what you mean by communal or non communal ? What the vast majority under stand by communal is related to the word community and that means any work, service, activity done for a community, to which you belong to ,or you live with or you want to serve or support that group of persons in the community. Here it does not restrict you to do similar activities or services for one or more communities. Most important the word "community" is an ancient one ,when there were constrains of movement, and at a certain place one type of persons used to live and when we meant doing something it was meant for all the persons living in that area and that group of persons was referred to as belonging to that community.

The venom of division in community by religion is a byproduct of Congress mostly; and partly by the Muslim League,and that was before Independence and this divisive policy of British Raj resulted in division of our country Hindustan in two parts, and this much maligned trick of "divide and rule" along with division on the basis of religion has been inherited and applied by at least some highly patriotic persons of this great freedom winning Congress party.

The erstwhile community feeling of living together irrespective of different castes,breed and religions, and the binding thread of oneness has been destroyed only by these few power hungry politicians for their greed to capture power by any means or through non ethics ways. Yes this cruel habit of misguiding innocent public in the name of minority or majority religion has reaped them good dividend politically, but the people has lost everything even after more then six decades has passed of our own Swaraj rule.

When justifiably the actual division should have been on the lines of "haves or haven't"; rich or poor; employed or non employed; secured or unprotected; living with dignity or dependent on doles; that should be the criteria and guiding factor, that one should mark a group of persons or community. 

How a person with empty stomach, malnourished children, without  a shelter home, without a job or unemployed youth; that may be belong to any of the religion either majority or minority; have any special meaning for this so called and created word communal worth solving any of his or her problems. It is the only gimmick to divert the attention of public from their real woes,or it is practised more to hide the political leaders, for their failure in doing their duties, for their negligence, for their involvement in corruption, their hunger and fight for power at any cost.